|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Portfolio Rubric
|
Quality
of evidence
|
Narratives
|
Organization
and use of digital features
|
|
|
4
|
Evidence is relevant
to competencies. Artifacts are high-quality examples. Evidence of application
of technology with K-12 students (e.g. videotape and/or samples of student
work). Good variety of artifacts; more than one artifact for several competencies.
Excellent. Reflects extra effort, initiative, and creativity. |
Section/standard
narratives are thoughtful, clearly describe each piece of evidence, and
specifically link each artifact to one or more competency. Clear goals
set for future professional growth in technology with ideas of how to
accomplish. Well written and proofread to catch spelling and grammatical
errors. |
Portfolio is multimedia.
Creative and appropriate graphics. Includes K-12 student-created audio
and/or video. Evidence of attention to visual design guidelines. Links
work and are easy to follow. Complete, well organized, and professional.
|
|
3
|
Relevant evidence
for all competencies, though few have more than one artifact. Artifacts
represent adequate quality work. Good. Reflects some effort and initiative. |
Section introductions
adequately describe most pieces of evidence and how they relate to one
or more competencies. Goals set for future growth in technology for at
least 2 sections. Contents adequately written and proofread to catch most
spelling and grammatical errors. |
Most links work
and are easy to follow. Adequate use of graphics. Does not include K-12
student-created audio or video. Sound and graphics used appropriately;
add value to the portfolio. Complete, fairly well organized, and professional. |
|
2
|
No evidence included
for one or two competencies or artifacts included are not relevant to
the competencies. Quality of artifacts is generally low. Only somewhat
adequate overall. |
Section introductions
don't clearly describe the evidence or how it relates to specific competencies.
Goals for future growth in technology not described or goals are too general.
Too many spelling and grammatical errors present you in the best light. |
Several links
don’t work; files are improperly named. Minimal additional features
(such as graphics and sound) are used, or graphics and sounds are inappropriate
for a professional portfolio. Components are included, but portfolio is
not very well organized and doesn't represent adequate effort. |
|
1
|
Significant weaknesses
in documenting most competencies. Artifacts from class assignments were
submitted without attention to feedback. Little apparent effort to find/select
evidence. |
Unsatisfactory
introductions: don't describe pieces of evidence or how they relate to
the competencies. Writing is not clear and little or no effort seems to
have been made to correct spelling and grammar. |
Links missing,
don’t work, or navigation is difficult to follow. No additional
features (such as graphics and sound) are used; portfolio is not multimedia.
Portfolio is incomplete and/or very disorganized. Unprofessional. |
|
score
|
Total _________ return to portfolio